Skip to main content
Head-to-Head

GLG vs AlphaSights

The industry pioneer vs. the fastest-growing challenger. Here's how they actually compare on the things that matter — pricing, speed, AI, compliance, and product depth.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Metric GLG AlphaSights
Founded 1998 2008
Headquarters New York, NY London, UK (Global HQ); New York, NY (Americas HQ)
Expert Network Size ~1.2M Not publicly disclosed
Employees 1,001–5,000 2,000+
Pricing Model Mixed Per-call
Pricing Detail Per-call / project / subscription Per-interaction pricing; enterprise rates negotiated individually. Third-party benchmarks suggest rates in the ~$1,350/hr range.
Delivery Model Concierge Concierge
Category Global Leader Global Leader
Region Strength Global Global
AI Badge AI Research AI Matching
Compliance Strong Compliance Strong Compliance

Products & Services

G
GLG Services

  • GLG Calls
  • GLG Surveys
  • GLG Events
  • GLG Library
  • GLG Integrated Insights
  • GLG Qualitative
  • GLG Placements
  • GLG Institute

A
AlphaSights Services

  • Expert Calls
  • Surveys
  • AlphaNow
  • AlphaGPT
  • Proprietary Events
  • Custom Research Projects

AI & Technology

GLG AI Stack

  • Ask AI in myGLG
  • Cross-transcript synthesis
  • External-file merge for research synthesis
  • Interactive transcript views
  • Expert-side app with AI-suggested responses

AlphaSights AI Stack

  • AlphaGPT conversational AI for research synthesis
  • AlphaGraph ML knowledge graph (25M+ expert-to-company relationships)
  • AlphaNow content platform with weekly expert insights
  • AI Project Summary for automated call and project-level synthesis
  • NLP transcription with human QA

Key Differentiators

Why Choose GLG

  • Category pioneer with 25+ years in expert-network workflows
  • Very large global network and broad functional coverage
  • Strong compliance infrastructure and auditable process design
  • Broader multi-format research stack than pure call-only competitors
  • Increasing AI-assisted workflow depth via myGLG and transcript tooling

Why Choose AlphaSights

  • Speed of expert delivery — often within hours
  • Custom-sourcing model (fresh recruitment per project, not static database)
  • High-touch, relationship-driven client service with dedicated project teams
  • AlphaGPT and AlphaGraph AI-assisted research workflows
  • Strong PE, hedge fund, and consulting client base
  • AlphaNow reusable content library

Best For

GLG Is Best For

  • → Hedge funds & asset managers
  • → Private equity / private credit
  • → Consulting & market-research firms
  • → Law firms
  • → Large enterprises needing primary research or diligence
  • → Teams needing bespoke calls and reusable content workflows

AlphaSights Is Best For

  • → Private equity deal teams under time pressure
  • → Hedge funds needing fast thematic or company research
  • → Consulting firms on tight engagement timelines
  • → Corporate strategy and M&A teams at large enterprises
  • → Teams that value high-touch service over self-serve platforms

The Bottom Line

GLG is the industry's broadest platform. If you need multi-format research (calls + surveys + events + library + placements), global coverage across nearly every sector, and the most established compliance infrastructure in the space, GLG is the default choice for large institutional buyers. The trade-off: it's typically the most expensive option, and the breadth of the platform can feel heavy for teams that just need fast expert calls.

AlphaSights positions itself as the speed and service leader. If your team operates under time pressure (PE deal diligence, fast-moving hedge fund research), AlphaSights' custom-sourcing model and high-touch project management are a core part of their value proposition. Their AI investment (AlphaGPT, AlphaGraph) is aggressive, and the firm has maintained a 70% CAGR since founding. The trade-off: narrower product suite than GLG, and the per-call pricing model can add up for high-volume users.

Some research teams use both — GLG for breadth and AlphaSights for speed. They're complementary more than they are substitutes.